<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Which Digital Slr Is The Best For An Intermediate Photographer?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wildprism.com/which-digital-slr-is-the-best-for-an-intermediate-photographer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wildprism.com/which-digital-slr-is-the-best-for-an-intermediate-photographer/</link>
	<description>Wildlife Photography Resource</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 23:31:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Madison B</title>
		<link>http://www.wildprism.com/which-digital-slr-is-the-best-for-an-intermediate-photographer/comment-page-1/#comment-3643</link>
		<dc:creator>Madison B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 20:56:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wildprism.com/which-digital-slr-is-the-best-for-an-intermediate-photographer/#comment-3643</guid>
		<description>Good question, hope this helps:
I just bought a used Nikon F80 film camera and standard lens ($250). 
I shot some pix on Velvia ($15 a roll proc. incl.) and scanned them with my ages-old Minolta scanner (worth exactly zero on the open market).
I made a print at home ($2.00) and guess what? 
The results blew my D50 and 18-70 lens ($1200 new) into the weeds.
Now, a brand-new 10mpixel digicam may crush the Velvia, but I&#039;d really want to be sure of this before I shelled out for it.
And, PS,  I could have had the Fuji drum scanned at 46mpixels!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good question, hope this helps:<br />
I just bought a used Nikon F80 film camera and standard lens ($250).<br />
I shot some pix on Velvia ($15 a roll proc. incl.) and scanned them with my ages-old Minolta scanner (worth exactly zero on the open market).<br />
I made a print at home ($2.00) and guess what?<br />
The results blew my D50 and 18-70 lens ($1200 new) into the weeds.<br />
Now, a brand-new 10mpixel digicam may crush the Velvia, but I&#8217;d really want to be sure of this before I shelled out for it.<br />
And, PS,  I could have had the Fuji drum scanned at 46mpixels!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: V2K1</title>
		<link>http://www.wildprism.com/which-digital-slr-is-the-best-for-an-intermediate-photographer/comment-page-1/#comment-3644</link>
		<dc:creator>V2K1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 20:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wildprism.com/which-digital-slr-is-the-best-for-an-intermediate-photographer/#comment-3644</guid>
		<description>i think the Nikon D40&#039;s are coming down in price.  Check it out on dpreview.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think the Nikon D40&#8217;s are coming down in price.  Check it out on dpreview.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
