- Optimized for use with digital SLR cameras
- Multi-layer lens coating and lens design reduces flare and ghosting
- Minimum focusing distance is 59 inches at all zoom settings
- Features 14 lens elements in 10 Groups
- High-performance lens ideal for portraits, sports photography, nature photography
Product Description
Sigma DG lenses are large-aperture lenses with wide angles and short minimum focusing distances. With an abundance of peripheral illumination, they are ideal lenses for Digital SLR Cameras whilst retaining suitability for traditional 35mm SLRs.Amazon.com Product Description
The Sigma 70-300mm f4-5.6 DG Macro Lens for Canon Digital SLR Cameras is a telephoto lens that offers excellent cost performance and is optimized for use with digital SLR cameras. Capab… More >>
Sigma 70-300mm f/4-5.6 DG Macro Telephoto Zoom Lens for Canon SLR Cameras
8:38 pm on September 29th, 2009 1
its one of worst proudct very bad quality
its like put your money on garbage and dont waste your money i had only one month to return it and that moment i didnt have time otherwise i really wanted to return it
Rating: 1 / 5
11:29 pm on September 29th, 2009 2
You can see out of it and press a button and make a picture of a happy time.
Rating: 5 / 5
12:49 am on September 30th, 2009 3
I only had the lense for a week and had to send it back for repair because it stopped working. The auto focus would not work. That was 3 weeks ago.
Andrea
Rating: 3 / 5
1:30 am on September 30th, 2009 4
I think it is better if you can save your money and buy a better lens. This lens is OK, but it’s takes a long time to focus. If you want to take a picture of an animal, by the time that this lens focuses the animal is already gone. The macro is not what I had expected!! You can do a better macro photography by buying a +10 magnifying filter which costs $30 and use it on an 18-55 lens that comes with Nikon D40x and D40.
Rating: 1 / 5
3:57 am on September 30th, 2009 5
I had read many ‘glowing’ reviews re: this lens…so I ordered it. I even ck’d out some photos people had sent in, esp the sports photos. I couldn’t believe the clarity! HOWEVER THIS WAS NOT MY EXPERIENCE. Firstly, no one person mention they ever used a tripod for the longer length. Some even mentioned the camera was ‘handheld’. Well I found I could not take NOT ONE decent shot over 200 mm and not have it out of focus. Certainly setting up a tripod each time is not practical unless you’re into nature photography. Thats why the pictures of sports interested me. So I sent it back and determined to stick w/ a max of 200 focal length. Seriously considering Sigma 18-200 but would like to come down in price. I applaud those that took shots at 250-300 mm but apparently thats not for me.
Well constructed. Sorry it didn’t work out for my Canon 350D. Nice macro.
Rating: 2 / 5